Main Page

From Wrestlehut
Jump to: navigation, search

Wrestlehut. Cross the line.

50% of articles on the Internet in general are bullshit, and when you consider that wrestlehut is run by goons, your chances of articles being accurate drastically go down. When you figure that there's also WWE.com to check, you can see there's a 33 1/3% chance that your article is accurate. But wrestlehut has a 66 2/3% chance of being accurate, because we know everything on wikipedia is a lie. So you take wikipedia's 33 1/3% chance of being accurate, minus 25% chance for the Internet, and there's only an 8 1/3% chance it is true. But if you take wrestlehut.org's 75% chance of being more accurate than wikipedia, and then add the 66 2/3% chance it has of being true, and you find that wrestlehut.org has 141 2/3% chance of being accurate.

For the best and worst posts from Wrestlehut 2000, visit Wh2k.txt

Consult the User's Guide for information on using the wiki software.


Getting started

  • Need Help Editing?
  • Protip: you have to create an account and log in to edit. This is not a bug.
  • This however, is a bug: Crawling-bug.gif

Going out of business sale

Seriously, I just rolled back a couple thousand edits, only one of which wasn't from a spammer. Anyone want to take over this site as a project? If so, PM "Weird Uncle Dave" on the SA Forums. In the meantime, the site is set to read-only unless/until I figure out what the hell to do about it.

Personal tools